Backstory: The Great War / Machine War
-
Backstory: The Great War / Machine War
As one of the three elements of The Cataclysm, The Great War / Machine War is an important part of the backstory of SparkQuest. I’d like to develop the idea more to gain understanding on its impact on various characters and story dynamics. Especially, right now we’re talking about Robert Kieft who fought in it on the Democratic Union side.
Here’s my ideas so far:
- Sometime after the Democratic Union wins the Second Civil War and creates the Democratic States of America, MARTIE reveals himself to Yanis Aiwan who helps him go public.
- Aiwan and MARTIE release the World Union hack which allows people all over the world who have bio-chips to join the WU virtual nation.
- Feeling their power eroding, many nations begin to regulate then persecute WU users. This leads Aiwan and MARTIE to consolidate an alliance to protect the WU and its users, but conflict and abuse continues. This leads to the WU to start building security apparatus and take over states, first quietly, than will more coercion and force.
- Though progress has been made on WU goals, MARTIE convinces Aiwan and the WU leaders that the only way their vision will be realized is if the whole world participates in the WU.
- This leads to an aggressive plan to pressure, or, if necessary, fight to unite the world in the WU.
- The war commences with the World Union against the Resistant States.
- MARTIE begins to execute his plan to consolidate his power. He murders Aiwan and much of the other WU leadership in false flag operations. Now with total power and automated armies at his command, MARTIE decommissions all human military units and service personnel. This leaves life-long soldiers like Robert Kieft to seek mercenary jobs as security contractors.
I feel like these ideas could be developed more completely. Here are some questions I’d like to work on together:
- Do we want to model this on a historical war? If so, which one and to what extent?
- When wars happen, we always ask what motivated the violence. It doesn’t make sense to us otherwise. Do we like these motivations? Would they realistically lead to WWIII? These motivations are probably more consistent with the Soviets motivations entering WWII. Do you agree with that?
Log in to reply.